Evolution vs. Intelligent Design as Science in the classroom.


Is intelligent design religion or science?

Teaching The Science of Evolution or Religion: The Creation Debate

Evolution Fun Dover Monkey Trials U.S. Fathers Church v State Previous • Next

The Evolution of Man

Evolution is infinite chain of subsequent forms.

Most people in the world share 2-4% of DNA with Neanderthals while a few inherited genes from Denisovans, a study confirms. Denisovan DNA lives on only in Pacific island dwellers, while Neanderthal genes are more widespread, researchers report in the journal Science. Meanwhile, some parts of our genetic code show little trace of our extinct cousins. They include hundreds of genes involved in brain development and language.

2017 A newly discovered missing link
Two fossils of an ape-like creature which had human-like teeth have been found in Bulgaria and Greece, dating to 7.2 million years ago. The history of human evolution has been rewritten after scientists discovered that Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa. An international team of researchers say the findings entirely change the beginning of human history and place the last common ancestor of both chimpanzees and humans - the so-called Missing Link - in the Mediterranean region. “Graecopithecus is not an ape. He is a member of the tribe of hominins and the direct ancestor of homo. “The food of the Graecopithecus was related to the rather dry and hard savannah vegetation, unlike that of the recent great apes which are leaving in forests. Therefore, like humans, he has wide molars and thick enamel.

In the classic 1960 film Inherit the Wind , science meets tradition in a dramatic rendition of the 1925 Scopes “Monkey Trial” that occurred in Dayton, Tennessee. In reality, schoolteacher John T. Scopes was tried for teaching evolution as fact in Tennessee schools, which at the time violated state law. In the film, actors' personal belief systems reversed: conservative Catholic Spencer Tracy portrayed liberal attorney Henry Drummond (modeled after Clarence Darrow), while liberal Unitarian Fredric March played arch conservative lawyer and presidential candidate Matthew Harrison Brady, modeled after William Jennings Bryan.

LET'S TALK ABOUT EVOUTION

2015 HUMAN teeth discovered in central China provide evidence that our species left the African continent up to 70,000 years earlier than prevailing theories suggest, according to the latest study. Homo sapiens reached present-day China 80,000-120,000 years ago, according to the study, which could redraw the migration map for modern humans. The model that is generally accepted is that modern humans left Africa only 50,000 years ago." In this case, we are saying the H. sapiens is out of Africa much earlier" said Maria Martinon-Torres, a researcher at University College London and a co-author of the study.journal Nature. While the route they traveled remains unknown, previous research suggests the most likely path out of East Africa to east Asia was across the Arabian Peninsula and the Middle East.
The findings also mean that the first truly modern humans — thought to have emerged in east Africa some 200,000 years ago — landed in China well before they went to Europe. There is no evidence to suggest that H. sapiens entered the European continent earlier than 45,000 years ago, at least 40,000 years after they showed up in present-day China. The 47 teeth exhumed from a knee-deep layer of grey, sandy clay inside Fuyan Cave in Daoxian County, Hunan Province, closely resemble those of “contemporary humans,” according to the study.

Neanderthals - for whom we have hundreds of fossils including near complete skeletons - interbred with the founders of living European and East Asian populations. Estimates published in 2014 indicate that 1.5-2% of the genome of living non-Africans was inherited from Neanderthals. Yet, East Asians have significantly more Neanderthal genes than Europeans do indicating that their ancestors interbred with this archaic species perhaps more than once, or in an event separate to that involving the ancestors of western Eurasians.
'Denisovans,' is known from the fossil record only by a single tooth, finger bone and toe bone. Yet their fully sequenced genome shows that they shared their genes with the ancestors of some Southeast Asians, New Guineans and Aboriginal Australians. These living people also show the genetic signs of interbreeding with Neanderthals, so have inherited DNA from both of these species. Populations living today in Tibet to thrive at high altitude is the result of a gene inherited from the mysterious 'Denisovans.' The gene in question - EPAS1 - is associated with differences in haemoglobin levels at high altitude underpinning the capacity of the individuals carrying it to pump more oxygen around in their blood. The presence of Denisovan DNA outside of New Guinea - its place of highest occurrence - is probably the result of recent population migrations from New Guinea into Australia, Southeast Asia and mainland East Asia.

4 million years Shared Genetic history With Fish

9/13/15 New human-like species discovered The species, which has been named naledi, has been classified in the grouping, or genus, Homo, to which modern humans belong. The researchers who made the find have not been able to find out how long ago these creatures lived - but the scientist who led the team, Prof Lee Berger, told BBC News that he believed they could be among the first of our kind (genus Homo) and could have lived in Africa up to three million years ago.

Teeth got their enamel from fish scales, scientists say

5/19/14 The organization creating the curriculum, headed up by Hobby Lobby heir Steve Green, has everyone from the ACLU to religious scholars gearing up for what could be an impending cultural, and legal, battle. The Mustang School District in the suburbs of Oklahoma City voted to implement an elective Bible curriculum in its high schools.
Bible as Literal Truth?
That's the kind of talk that worries lawyers and atheists alike, who worry that Green's outspoken belief in the Bible as literal truth could impact his ability to present a curriculum that is an objectively academic study of the Bible's role in history — which is exactly what it needs to do in order to be legal. The curriculum might not teach the Bible as truth, but the teacher might.

WHYY.org Inside Your Inner Fish

VIDEOS on Youtube

Your DNA comes out of the sea onto the land Tiktaalik (Your Inner Fish)

The ancestor of recent vertebrate teeth was a tooth-like structure on the outer body surface of jawless fishes. Over the course of 500,000,000 years of evolution, many of those structures migrated into the mouth cavity. In addition, the total number of teeth per dentition generally decreased and teeth morphological complexity increased. Teeth form mainly on the jaws within the mouth cavity through mutual, delicate interactions between dental epithelium and oral ectomesenchyme. It is the concentration of a few signaling molecules that determines the fate of individual cells during the early development of organisms. Molecular biologists report that a variety of molecular mechanisms accounts for the interpretation of the concentration of the signaling molecule Hedgehog. “The concentration of Hedgehog makes the thumb of the right hand grow on the left hand side and the thumb of the left hand grow on the right hand side.” Thus, scientists define Hedgehog as a morphogen - a signal that is concentration-dependent and controls the pattern formation of an organism.

With Your Inner Fish Tiktaalik Gets Up Close
Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia

From Fin To Limb - The Hand Traces Us Back to every animal on earth then back to the Fish.

Sonic hedgehog molecule gene:We can see the Embryo bud shape pattern of our digits. It Forms the shape of our hands and Links humans every animal on earth,

A rebroadcast of our conversation with paleontologist Neil Shubin February 18, 2008
Paleontologist and professor of anatomy NEIL SHUBIN tells us about his book “Your Inner Fish: A Journey Into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body .”

Your Inner Fish by Neil Shubin

The cells that make our bones, nerves, guts, and so on look and behave entirely differently. Despite these differences, there is a deep similarity among every cell inside our bodies: all of them contain exactly the same DNA. If DNA contains the information to build our bodies, tissues, and organs, how is it that cells as different as those found in muscle, nerve, and bone contain the same DNA? The answer lies in understanding what pieces of DNA (the genes) are actually turned on in every cell. A skin cell is different from a neuron because different genes are active in each cell. When a gene is turned on, it makes a protein that can affect what the cell looks like and how it behaves. Therefore, to understand what makes a cell in the eye different from a cell in the bones of the hand, we need to know about the genetic switches that control the activity of genes in each cell and tissue. Here's an important fact: these genetic switches help to assemble us. At conception, we start as a single cell that contains all the DNA needed to build our body. The plan for that entire body unfolds via instructions contained in this single microscopic cell. To go from this generalized egg cell to a complete human, with trillions of specialized cells organized in just the right way, whole batteries of genes need to be turned on and off at just the right stages of development. Like a concerto composed of individual notes played by many instruments, our bodies are a composition of individual genes turning on and off inside each cell during our development…

Kanzi Built A Fire 9/22/14
Kanzi, a bonobo ape, amazing builds a fire and roasts marshmallows in a video released by Animal Planet. A bonobo ape named Kanzi is seen building a fire to roast marshmallows. Kanzi breaks down kindling, and stacks wood before striking a match and creating a campfire. it's a spectacular moment to witness as fire is considered to be one of the main steps in the development of human civilization.

We seem to have caught evolution red handed 9/24/14 "The amazing thing is that we have a good genome of a 45,000 year old person who was close to the ancestor of all present-day humans outside Africa," Prof Paabo DNA analysis of a 45,000-year-old human has helped scientists pinpoint when our ancestors interbred with Neanderthals. The genome sequence from a thigh bone found in Siberia shows the first episode of mixing occurred between 50,000 and 60,000 years ago. The male hunter is one of the earliest modern humans discovered in Eurasia. The study in Nature journal also supports the finding that our species emerged from Africa some 60,000 years ago, before spreading around the world. The analysis raises the possibility that the human line first emerged millions of years earlier than current estimates.

What Should Teachers Say to Religious Students Who Doubt Evolution?

It seems appropriate to mention a Prize I have established at Stevens Institute of Technology ~ Dave Farber

"Joseph M. Farber Memorial Prize - The prize is named for Joseph Farber, the late son of Dr. David Farber (B.E., 1956; M.A. 1961; Honorary Doctor of Engineering ), who at the time of his untimely death at the age of 34 was an associate with the law firm Pepper Hamilton in Philadelphia. Joseph Farber was instrumental in the landmark Kitzmiller d. Dover case, which defended the First Amendement's Establishment Clause, by holding that schools could not requite the teaching of “intelligent design.” Before earning his law degree, he had earned a Bachelor's, Master's, and Doctoral degrees in philosophy, all from the University of Pennsylvania.

The Joseph M. Farber Memorial Prize recognizes a graduating senior majoring in one of the disciplines of the College of Arts and Letters who displays a keen interest in and concern for civil liberties and their importance in preserving and protecting human rights. "


EVOLUTION IS NOT A THEORY

Jesus Camp Trailer

Brain Washing ( Jesus Camp ''Highlights'' )

3/24/14 Special report: Taxpayers fund creationism in the classroom
Taxpayers in 14 states will bankroll nearly $1 billion this year in tuition for private schools, including hundreds of religious schools that teach Earth is less than 10,000 years old, Adam and Eve strolled the garden with dinosaurs, and much of modern biology, geology and cosmology is a web of lies. Their course materials nurture disdain of the secular world, distrust of momentous discoveries and hostility toward mainstream scientists. They often distort basic facts about the scientific method — teaching, for instance, that theories such as evolution are by definition highly speculative because they haven't been elevated to the status of “scientific law.

Taxpayers fund creationism in the classroom

2014 Taxpayers in 14 states will bankroll nearly $1 billion this year in tuition for private schools, including hundreds of religious schools that teach Earth is less than 10,000 years old, Adam and Eve strolled the garden with dinosaurs, and much of modern biology, geology and cosmology is a web of lies. Now a major push to expand these voucher programs is under way from Alaska to New York, a development that seems certain to sharply increase the investment.

A BIG-MONEY PUSH
Voucher supporters have skillfully built strong networks of allies in many states. They've spent heavily to campaign for sympathetic lawmakers, both Democrats and Republicans — often targeting primary races to knock out anti-voucher candidates early. They've staged rallies packed with cheering families.

Sep 9 2013 Texas still seeing attempts to limit evolution in school textbooks Texas' school board, which has waged an ongoing battle over science education (among other topics), is back at it. In 2009, a bruising battle created science standards that questioned common descent and the age of the universe. Since then, textbook publishers have attempted to craft science texts that implement Texas' standards. That process has reached the point where the board invited outside experts to critique the textbooks. In keeping with the school board's history, that process has also gone badly astray. Rather than choosing scientific experts and educators, the school board chose two people (Walter Bradley and Raymond Bohlin) who have been involved in the Discovery Institute, the organization that has backed the intelligent design movement. Bradley in particular was involved in crafting the wedge document, which calls for a cultural effort to get rid of science's focus on natural causes in the hope that it would advance theistic views. Another person asked to review the texts is Ide Trotter, a retired engineer. He's a key figure in a group called Texans for Better Science Education. That group's URL, strengthsandweaknesses.org, echoes language that was specifically removed from the standards because it is used to enable religiously motivated attacks on evolution education. With the exception of two works by Darwin, the group's recommended books are all products of the $$$ Discovery Institute. (We reviewed one and found it to be largely unscientific.) The Texas Freedom Network, which advocates for separation of church and state (among other causes), has now used the state's Public Information Act to request the results of this group's textbook reviews. And they're about what you'd expect and, most likely, what some members of the school board were hoping for. In the evaluation of one textbook, a reviewer openly advocated for introducing religion into the science classroom. "I understand the National Academy of Science's strong support of the theory of evolution. At the same time, this is a theory. As an educator, parent, and grandparent, I feel very firmly that ' creation science' based on biblical principles should be incorporated into every biology book that is considered for adoption. Students should have the opportunity to use their critical thinking skills to weigh the evidence between evolution and 'creation science.'" A push for creationism was also made in subtler terms. For instance, one reviewer suggests, "The fossil record can be interpreted in other ways than evolutionary with equal justification. Text should ask students to analyze and compare alternative theories." The "alternative theories" were left unstated . [snip]

2012 The American Journal of Human Biology looks at the genomes of three female Neandertals from Croatia. Their DNA was the basis of the first effort to compile a complete Neandertal genetic sequence , which was published in 2010. The researchers focused their attention on 40 well-studied stretches of genetic material that help determine pigmentation in living people. A particular form of the gene known as TPCN2 , for example, bestows brown hair in modern humans; any other form means hair that's another color. The female Neandertal known as Vi33.26, for example, had seven genes for brown eyes, one for "not-brown" eyes, three for blue eyes, and four for "not-blue eyes." By the researchers' reckoning, that means a six-gene balance in favor of brown and a negative balance for blue, so Vi33.26's eyes were probably brown. According to this method, all three Neandertals had a dark complexion and brown eyes , and although one was red-haired, two sported brown locks.

30 Indonesian Women (Accidentally) Founded Madagascar

MSNBC Video: High School Student Takes On Administration

Texas Ed Board compromises on evolution material s 8/2011
The Texas State Board of Education delivered a blow to social conservatives Friday, giving final approval to supplemental high school science materials after a brief flare-up over some lessons teaching the principles of evolution.
The lessons in question included a lab comparison on chimpanzee and human skulls, the fossil record and cell complexity.
A board-appointed reviewer had called the lessons errors and recommended changes, but a group of scientists objected on Friday, threatening to re-ignite a fierce debate over teaching evolution in Texas public schools.

http://www.repealcreationism.com/
On May, 5, the City of New Orleans overwhelmingly endorsed Senator Peterson's SB 70 to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act. The New Orleans City Council voted 6-0 in favor of the repeal.

Vatican: Faithful Should Listen to Science By NICOLE WINFIELD Associated Press Writer


http://www.salon.com/ November 04,2005
VATICAN CITY -- A Vatican cardinal said Thursday the faithful should listen to what secular modern science has to offer, warning that religion risks turning into "fundamentalism" if it ignores scientific reason. Cardinal Paul Poupard, who heads the Pontifical Council for Culture, made the comments at a news conference on a Vatican project to help end the "mutual prejudice" between religion and science that has long bedeviled the Roman Catholic Church and is part of the evolution debate in the United States. The Vatican project was inspired by Pope John Paul II's 1992 declaration that the church's 17th-century denunciation of Galileo was an error resulting from "tragic mutual incomprehension." Galileo was condemned for supporting Nicolaus Copernicus' discovery that the Earth revolved around the sun; church teaching at the time placed Earth at the center of the universe. <snip>

Dangerous Memes - Dan Dennett examines religious belief through the lens of biology . All religion should to be taught in schools, so we can understand its nature as a natural phenomenon. The Intellegent Design movement is basically a hoax. The key to domination of the planet is culture and the key to culture is religion.
True Story : A parasite that gets into a mouse and needs to get into the belly of a cat and it turns the mouse into mighty mouse makes it fearless so it runs out into the open where it will get eaten by a cat.
Does that ever happen to us? Yes it does. We also have these hijackers, parasites that infects the brain that induces suicidal behavior on behalf of a cause other than of one's own genetic fitness. Islam and Christianity both teach people to surrender their lives. Surrendered people obey gods word even if it doesn't make sense!
Everytime you read it or say it you make another copy in your brain.

" Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away " ~ Philip K. Dick

Ancient Aliens - We are not alone in the cosmos. See [ Moses ]

Hominids diverged from the chimp branch of the family tree roughly six million years ago, producing a series of evolutionary dead-ends before the ultimately successful genus Homo emerged. H. neanderthalensis and H. sapiens grew out of the same line at different times.
The Neanderthals' ancestors diverged first, and they left Africa a couple of hundred thousand years ahead of ours. Homo sapiens arrived in Europe about 50,000 years ago. The two species overlapped for perhaps 20,000 years before the Neanderthals went extinct. Scientists still aren't sure why. A detailed analysis of human and chimp DNA suggests the lines finally diverged less than 5.4 million years ago. [ 1 ]

Most K12 State Science Standards Don't Make the Grade.

Who is Teaching Science in K12 Schools?

New Jersey is the fourth state so far to reject the $800,000 abstinence education money , after California, Pennsylvania and Maine.

Stand Up For Real Science A campaign is underway across the US to promote the "critical analysis" of evolution in public school science classrooms. This campaign can also be found under the guises of "teaching the strengths and weaknesses of evolution" or "teaching the controversy about evolution." Promoters of these campaigns claim to be simply "supporting academic freedom." Unfortunately, these phrases are being used as euphemisms for the notion that the scientific evidence supporting evolution and long-refuted "criticisms" of evolution should be treated equally.

SCIENCE TEST SCORES FALL FOR HIGH SCHOOL SENIORS 2006
The first nationwide science test administered in five years shows that achievement among high school seniors has declined across the past decade, even as scores in science rose among fourth graders and held steady among eighth graders, reported the Education Department. The drop in science proficiency appeared to reflect a broader trend, in which some academic gains made in elementary grades and middle school have been seen to fade during the high school years. The science results came from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a comprehensive examination administered in 2005 by a branch of the Department of Education to hundreds of thousands of students in all 50 states. The science test, which was administered during the first months of 2005, covered the earth, physical and life sciences, writes Sam Dillon. Some teachers blamed the decreasing amount of time devoted to science in schools, in part because of the No Child Left Behind Law, whose requirements for annual testing in reading and math during the elementary grades have led many schools to decrease the time spent on science or to abandon its teaching altogether. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/24/education/24cnd-exam.html

" The State of State Science Standards 2005 " the first comprehensive study of science academic standards conducted since 2000 -- appraised the quality of each states K-12 science standards as they are rushing to meet the No Child Left Behind Acts mandate for testing in this critical subject. The results are mixed. Nearly half of the fifty states surveyed received grades of "D" or "F" in a new review of statewide academic standards for primary-secondary school science. Every state received a letter grade based on how well its standards met a set of rigorous criteria, including:

  • Do the standards contain clear and fair expectations by grade level for students?
  • Are the standards organized in a sensible way, both showing logical progression from grade to grade and easily navigated so teachers, parents, and the public can understand?
  • Is there an appropriate amount of science content, and if so, do the standards outline the best approach to share that content?
  • Are the expectations outlined specific enough, yet set high aims that will equip students with the science skills they need for college?
  • Are the standards appropriately serious, or do they incorporate pseudo-scientific fads or politics?

Scientists Create First Synthetic Cell, Opening New Era in Biology By ROBERT LEE HOTZ
5/2010 Heralding a potential new era in biology, scientists for the first time have created a synthetic cell, completely controlled by man-made genetic instructions, which can survive and reproduce itself, researchers at the private J. Craig Venter Institute. Scientists have been altering DNA piecemeal for a generation, producing a menagerie of genetically engineered plants and animals, but the ability to craft an entire organism offers a new power over life, they said. "This is literally a turning point in the relationship between man and nature," said molecular biologist Richard Ebright at Rutgers University, who wasn't involved in the project. "For the first time, someone has generated an entire artificial cell with pre-determined properties." David Magnus, director of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, said, "It has the potential to transform genetic engineering. The research is going to explode once you can create designer genomes." Vatican calls synthetic cell creation 'interesting'
The scientists didn't give the new organism its own species name, but they did give its synthetic genome an official version number, like the prototype of a computer software operating system. The genome is called Mycoplasma mycoides JCVI-syn1.0. "We call it the first synthetic cell," said genomics pioneer Craig Venter, who oversaw the project. "These are very much real cells." Created at a cost of $30 million, this experimental one-cell organism opens the way to the manipulation of life on a previously unattainable scale, several researchers and ethics experts said.
To set this novel bacterium and all its descendants apart from any natural creation, Dr. Venter and his colleagues wrote their names into the creature's chemical DNA code, along with three apt quotations. "They put some poetry into the genome," said Dr. Voigt. The scientists also encoded an email address and the name of a website, so that anyone who successfully deciphered the quotations hidden in the genome could notify the scientists. More importantly, these genetic watermarks allow the researchers to pick out their cells from among more natural varieties and, eventually, to assert ownership. "You have to have a way of tracking it," said Stanford ethicist Mildred Cho, who has studied the issues posed by the creation of such organisms.
Although the new cell, a form of bacteria, was conceived solely as a demonstration project, several biologists were certain that the laboratory technique used to birth it would soon be applied to other strains of bacteria with commercial potential. "I think this quickly will be applied to all the most important industrial bacteria," said biologist Christopher Voigt at the University of California, San Francisco, who is developing microbes that help make gasoline.
Although patents on single genes now face legal challenges, Dr. Venter said he intended to patent his experimental cells. "They are pretty clearly human inventions," he said.
New field, called synthetic biology, which combines chemistry, computer science, molecular biology, genetics and cell biology to breed industrial life forms that can secrete fuels, vaccines or other saleable products.To make the synthetic cell, a team of 25 researchers at labs in Rockville, Md., and San Diego, Calif., led by bioengineer Daniel Gibson and Dr. Venter essentially turned computer code into a new life form. They started with a species of bacteria called Mycoplasma capricolum and, by replacing its genome with one they wrote themselves, turned it into a customized variant of a second species called Mycoplasma mycoides, they reported. To begin, they wrote out the creature's entire genetic code as a digital computer file documenting more than one million base pairs of DNA in a biochemical alphabet of adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine. They edited that file, adding new code, and then sent that electronic data to a DNA sequencing company called Blue Heron Bio in Bothell, Wash., where it was transformed into hundreds of small pieces of chemical DNA, they reported. To assemble the strips of DNA, the researchers said they took advantage of the natural capacities of several types of existing cells to meld genes and chromosomes: They used yeast and e. coli bacteria to stitch those short sequences into ever-longer fragments until they had assembled the complete genome, as the entire set of an organism's genetic instructions is called. They transplanted that master set of genes into an emptied cell, where it converted the cell into a different species.

CHRISTIAN RIGHT "STRIKINGLY UNSUCCESSFUL" IN SCHOOL BOARD EFFORTS
During a period in which the Christian Right wielded a great deal of influence in the federal and state political spheres, it appears to have been strikingly unsuccessful in its long-term efforts to push state and local school boards to adopt science curricula that include questioning the theory of evolution and teaching intelligent design as a legitimate alternative theory of creation, according to a Connecticut College researcher. Kimberly Trebbi Richards found that the Christian Right's initial short-term successes occurred through exceptionally effective development of interest group organization and lobbying techniques focused on electing or re-electing supportive officials. However, the more permanent reversals of those short-term successes came through growing counter-organization by opposing groups and through court decisions. Richards examined case studies from three major state or local areas where the Christian Right was initially successful in influencing science education at the elementary or high school levels: Kansas, Georgia and Pennsylvania.

University of Calif. Sued Over Creationism
http://www.salon.com/wire/ap/archive.html?wire=D8C8AM600.htm August 27,2005 | LOS ANGELES
A group representing California religious schools has filed a lawsuit accusing the University of California system of discriminating against high schools that teach creationism and other conservative Christian viewpoints.
The Association of Christian Schools International, which represents more than 800 schools, filed a federal lawsuit Thursday claiming UC admissions officials have refused to certify high school science courses that use textbooks challenging Darwin's theory of evolution. Other rejected courses include "Christianity's Influence in American History."
According to the lawsuit, the Calvary Chapel Christian School in Murrieta was told its courses were rejected because they use textbooks printed by two Christian publishers, Bob Jones University Press and A Beka Books.
Wendell E. Bird, a lawyer for the association, said the policy violates the rights of students and religious schools.
"A threat to one religion is a threat to all," he said.
UC spokeswoman Ravi Poorsina said she could not comment, because the university had not been served with the lawsuit. Still, she said the university has a right to set course requirements.
"These requirements were established after careful study by faculty and staff to ensure that students who come here are fully prepared with broad knowledge and the critical thinking skills necessary to succeed," Poorsina.

Teachers have the lowest IQs of any college graduate group. Local school boards are elected. What are their qualifications? ANSWER

They have almost complete latitude to set the content of the curriculum! It is their decision that would have an unconstitutionally religious purpose and effect.

K - 12 PUBLIC EDUCATION

PROJECT STEVE

NCSE's "Project Steve" is a tongue-in-cheek parody of a long-standing creationist tradition of amassing lists of "scientists who doubt evolution" or "scientists who dissent from Darwinism." (For examples of such lists, see the FAQs on the web site at http://www.ncseweb.org/article.asp?category=18
Creationists draw up these lists to convince the public that evolution is somehow being rejected by scientists, that it is a "theory in crisis." Most members of the public lack sufficient contact with the scientific community to know that this claim is totally unfounded. NCSE has been exhorted by its members to compile a list of thousands of scientists affirming the validity of the theory of evolution, but although we easily could have done so, we have resisted such pressure. We did not wish to mislead the public into thinking that scientific issues are decided by who has the longer list of scientists!

Project Steve mocks this practice with a bit of humor, and because "Steves" (and Stephanies) are only about 1% of scientists, it incidentally makes the point that tens of thousands of scientists support evolution. And it honors the late Stephen Jay Gould, NCSE supporter and friend. As of 2/19, the Steveometer was 244 and rising. To join the list, write Skip Evans at evans@ncseweb.org.

Lawrence Krauss Talk of the Nation audio
*Ambrose Swasey professor of physics and chairman of the physics department at Case Western Reserve University Director of the Center for Education and Research in Cosmology and Astrophysics at Case Western Reserve University

The Complete Works of Charles Darwin Online

K-12 Government INITIATIVES from 1999

Creation vs. Evolution Mailing List

Banned Books - What you are NOT allowed to read in Public Schools.

John Oliver set up his own church to expose televangelists for fleecing vulnerable people
John Oliver on Sunday set his sights on the people who use religion to make millions and millions of dollars. "Churches are a cornerstone of American life. There are roughly 350,000 congregations in the United States, and many of them do great work — feeding the hungry, clothing the poor," Oliver said. "But this is not a story about them. This is about the churches that exploit people's faith for monetary gain." Oliver walked through how televangelists take money from vulnerable and often sick people, and benefit from vague tax policy, which grants them tax-exempt status even for million-dollar mansions. He then made a big reveal: He set up his own church to test the limits of the law.
http://www.vox.com/2015/8/17/9164511/john-oliver-televangelists-last-week-tonight

Intelligent Design vs. Evolution: Teaching in the Classroom

FUN

Evolution • Fun • Dover Monkey Trials U.S. Fathers Church v State Previous Next

Darwin Laptop stickers from Colin Purrington Department of Biology, Swarthmore College

ACTUAL REAL Disclaimer Stickers for textbooks

Dictionary for skeptics who would like to enhance their ability to tell people that they're probably wrong about intelligent design .

Children Learn by Monkey See, Monkey Do. Chimps Don't
Mr. Lyons sees his results as evidence that humans are hard-wired to learn by imitation, even when that is clearly not the best way to learn

Article “Intelligent design is simply the most recent version of creationism, which is admittedly a religious concept,” said Alan Leshner, chief executive of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science and publisher of the journal Science. “There is no scientific basis to intelligent design.” Science is concerned with the natural world, while intelligent design supposes an agent independent of the natural world. You can teach such concepts, Leshner and Scott say; indeed, you should — just do it in philosophy and religion and literature classes. Don't do it in science classes, because, by definition, that's religion. It isn't science.

One side can be wrong
Accepting 'intelligent design' in science classrooms would have disastrous consequences, warn Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne. If ID really were a scientific theory, positive evidence for it, gathered through research, would fill peer-reviewed scientific journals. This doesn't happen. It isn't that editors refuse to publish ID research. There simply isn't any ID research to publish. Its advocates bypass normal scientific due process by appealing directly to the non-scientific public and - with great shrewdness - to the government officials they elect.

University of Texas - Webcast entitled "God, Darwin, and Design"
On April 4, 2008 at 7:00 pm CT (GMT - April 5, 2008 at 12:00 am), Dr. Kenneth R. Miller, a professor of biology at Brown University will give a talk entitled God, Darwin, and Design: Lessons from the Dover Monkey Trial. Miller was a lead witness in the Pennsylvania "intelligent design" case that began in September 2005, and which has been front-page news since it started.

The Inner Life of a Cell animation conception and scientific content by Alain Viel and Robert A. Lue. Animation by John Liebler/XVIVO.

Scientists figured out decades ago that chimps are our nearest evolutionary cousins, roughly 98% to 99% identical to humans at the genetic level. No single, essential difference separates human beings from other animals -- but that hasn't stopped the phrasemakers from trying to find one. They have described humans as the animals who make tools, or reason, or use fire, or laugh, or any one of a dozen other appealing oversimplifications. Here's one more description for the list, as good as any other: Humans are the animals who wonder, intensely and endlessly, about their origin.

Dictionary of the History of Ideas

Watch the Journey of Mankind - VERY neat presentation (6-day creationists best avert their eyes) "A Digital Theory of Evolution" Cambridge University Library has placed Charles Darwin's private notes, drafts, and recipes on the Web--for free! The collection, which includes the first draft of On The Origin of Species, comprises some 20,000 items and 90,000 images.

Backward evolution” Spawns Ape-Like People

Watch Video

Turkey : Uner Tan of Cukurova University Medical School has discovered a genetic defect that may set back the clock on human evolution. Victims of this condition, called "Unertan Syndrome, " walk on all fours and mouth a primitive language. This mutation — known to run in one Turkish family — might offer scientists a new glimpse into human origins. “This syndrome interestingly exhibits prehuman features” and represents “possible backward evolution,” Tan said. The idea that evolution can run backward isn't new; some scientists say there have been confirmed cases of it in animals. But it's also a controversial subject and considered hard to prove.

Behaviors of those with Unertan Syndrome :

  • Have a rather primitive language of only a few hundred words;
  • Can not count from one to ten;
  • Are unaware of time and space;
  • Do not know their country or village;
  • Are unaware of year, season, day, and time
  • Can not hold their heads upright;
  • Like most primates, victims "walk" in a sequence of movements: after a foot touches the ground, the hand on the other side does.
  • Prof. Dr. Uner Tan, Cukurova University, Medical School, Department of Physiology,
    Adana, Turkey; e-mail: unertan@cu.edu.tr
  • References
    Tan U. Psychomotor theory: Mind-Brain-Body triad in health and disease. InSarbadhikari, S.N. (Ed.),
    Depression and Dementia: Progress in Brain Research, Clinical Applications. Hauppauge, NY:
    Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2005a; In press.
    Tan U. A new syndrome with quadrupedal gait, primitive speech, and severe mental retardation as a
    live model for human evolution. International Journal of Neuroscience 2005b; In press.
    Wheeler JA and Ford K. Geons, Black Holes & Quantum Foam. W.W. Norton Company, USA,
    1998.
    Yunes RA. The evolution of the human mind and logic-mathematics structures. Journal of Theoretical
    Biology 236; 95-110, 2005.
  • video clip http://www.neuroquantology.com/2005/04/Tan movie.mpg

Scientists consider the transition to upright walking as the most important event in human evolution. This freed the hands for skilled movements such as throwing and toolmaking. Upright walking became habitual by the age of Homo erectus 1,600,000 years ago. Modern languages evolved about 40,000 years ago, though Homo erectus likely had a rudimentary form of language.
http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/060221_unertanfrm.htm

Experts Explore the mysterious story of five siblings living in a remote Turkish village in " Family That Walks on All Fours ." Note: This program contains graphic information about physically and mentally handicapped individuals.
Please preview it to determine its appropriateness for your classroom. (Subjects covered: life science, evolution, genetics)
Teacher's Guide (Grades 9-12)
In this classroom activity, students use a viewing guide while watching a program about members of a Turkish family who walk on four limbs and discuss program themes after watching.
Program Transcript
The site includes a complete narration for this program.
The Genetic Factor (Grades 9-12)
Learn more about genes and mutations, the commonality of body-building genes among animals, and what factors may play a role in why five Turkish siblings are handwalkers in this interview with University of Wisconsin geneticist Sean Carroll.
The Family and Me (Grades 6-8, 9-12)
Find out how working with the family changed forever the life of Turkish psychologist Defne Aruoba.
Origins of Bipedalism (Grades 6-8, 9-12)
Sample leading hypotheses about why humans walk on two legs and cast your vote for your favorite. (Flash plug-in required; printable version available.)
Compare the Skeletons (Grades 6-8, 9-12)
See what made walking upright possible by examining the bone structures of a chimpanzee, an early human ancestor, and a modern human. (Flash plug-in required.)

Two Splits Between Human and Chimp Lines Suggested

The split between the human and chimpanzee lineages, a pivotal event in human evolution, may have occurred millions of years later than fossil bones suggest, and the break may not have been as clean as humans might like. A new comparison of the human and chimp genomes suggests that after the two lineages separated, they may have begun interbreeding.
The analysis, by David Reich, Nick Patterson and colleagues at the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Mass., sets up a serious conflict between the date of the split as indicated by fossil skulls, about 7 million years ago, and the much younger date implied by genetic analysis, as late as 5.4 million years ago. The conflict can be resolved, Dr. Reich's team suggests there were in fact two splits between the human and chimp lineages, with the first being followed by interbreeding between the two populations and then a second split. The earliest human-lineage fossil remains, like Sahelanthropus, seem clearly to have been bipeds, walking on two feet, but the ancestors of chimps presumably walked on their two feet and the knuckles of their hands, as do modern chimps.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/18/science/18evolve.html [Parallel account from the Washington Post, "Human Ancestors May Have Interbred With Chimpanzees" appended.]

KEY BRAIN GENE SHOWS EVOLUTION IN HUMANS 12/12/05

Duke University researchers say they've discovered the first brain regulatory gene that shows clear evidence of evolution from lower primates to humans. The study appears in the December issue of the Public Library of Science. They said the evolution of humans might well have depended in part on hyperactivation of the gene, called prodynorphin, or PDYN, that plays critical roles in regulating perception, behavior and memory. They reported that, compared with lower primates, humans possess a distinctive variant in a regulatory segment of the prodynorphin gene, which is a precursor molecule for a range of regulatory proteins called "neuropeptides." This variant increases the amount of prodynorphin produced in the brain.
While the researchers do not understand the physiological implications of the activated PDYN gene in humans, they said their finding offers an important and intriguing piece of a puzzle of the mechanism by which humans evolved from lower primates. They also said the discovery of the first evolutionarily selected gene is likely only the beginning of a new pathway of exploring how the pressure of natural selection influenced evolution of other genes. http://www.physorg.com/news8978.html

Top 10 Useless Limbs and othe Vestigial Organs

In Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species (1859) and his next publication, The Descent of Man (1871), he referred to several “vestiges” in human anatomy that were left over from the course of evolution. These vestigial organs, Darwin argued, are evidence of evolution and represent a function that was once necessary for survival, but over time that function became either diminished or nonexistent.

"Missing link" fossils of walking fish awe scientists

4/5/06 Scientists are hailing a set of newfound fossils as a "missing link" that documents one of evolution's most spectacular transitions: the shift from water to land.
The fossils come from a fierce fish with bones in its fins, which gave it enough strength to walk on land a bit, researchers say.
Tiktaalik is believed to fill an evolutionary gap between two species it is shown between: an earlier fish of 380 million years ago, of an ancestral group known as lobe-finned fish and a later land-dwelling animal of 360 million years ago.
"Human comprehension of the history of life on Earth is taking a major leap forward," said H. Richard Lane, director of sedimentary geology and paleobiology at the U.S. National Science Foundation in Arlington, Va., which helped fund the research.
Dubbed Tiktaalik roseae, the species " blurs the boundary between fish and land-living animal, " said the University of Chicago's Neil Shubin, co-leader of the research team.
The group published its findings in two papers in the April 6 issue of the research journal Nature.
Tiktaalik was a predator with sharp teeth, a crocodile-like head and a flattened body that seems to have lived in shallow streams, scientists said. Well-preserved fossils from several specimens indicated a length from 4 to 9 feet long.
About 375 million years old, it had a skull, neck, ribs and part of a fin like the earliest limbed animals, but also fins, scales and jaws like a fish, the researchers said.
The fossils, scientists argued, show how the fish's pectoral fins-those behind the head-evolved into the limbs of tetrapods, or four-limbed animals.
The fins contain bones that correspond to the upper arm, forearm and primitive parts of the hand of land-living animals, they explained.
The skeleton "indicates that it could support its body under the force of gravity whether in very shallow water or on land," said Farish Jenkins of Harvard University and a co-author of the papers describing the research. "This represents a critical early phase in the evolution of all limbed animals."
"Most of the major joints of the fin are functional in this fish," Shubin said. "The shoulder, elbow and even parts of the wrist are already there and working in ways similar to the earliest land-living animals."
"When we talk about the fish's wrist, we're talking about the origin of parts of our own wrist," he added. "This animal is both fish and tetrapod."
The fins have bones indicative of powerful, mobile appendages, the researchers said, but also contain in reduced form the thin rods found in normal fish fins. The wide, flattened body was described as tetrapod-like, but covered by scales like those of fish.
The fossils were found on Ellesmere Island in Arctic Canada, which during the animal's time had a warm, subtropical climate like that of the Amazon basin today, the scientists explained. The species would have lived in the small streams of this system, an environment conducive to the water-land transition.
"We knew that the rocks on Ellesmere Island offered a glimpse into the right time period and the right ancient environments" for such fossils, said Ted Daeschler of the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, a co-leader of the project.
But it wasn't easy to find them in the remote, rugged terrain, he added.
Paleontologists collected the specimens during four summers of exploration in Canada's Nunavut Territory, 600 miles from the North Pole. The fossils turned up in a remote valley of the island, where scientists said tantalizing fragments found in 2000 convinced them to return to the site.
Reaching the tundra site by helicopter and other aircraft, researchers said they battled frigid cold and biting winds to pull the fossils from frozen rock. Researchers carried guns because "we were always looking over our shoulders for polar bears-we saw lots of their tracks," Shubin said.
The finds came from layered rock of the so-called Fram Formation, deposits of meandering stream systems thought to have formed about 375 million years ago when North America was part of a supercontinent straddling the equator. These fossils and previously known fossil relatives suggest the evolution from fish to tetrapod occurred on this land mass, the researchers added.
Rather than using the traditional Latin or Greek to name the fossil, the scientists said, they asked local Nunavut residents to suggest a name. Community elders suggested Tiktaalik (tic-TA-lick), meaning large, shallow-water fish in the Inuktikuk language. The second part of the name, roseae, honors someone whose name is being kept under wraps because he or she helped fund the project on condition of anonymity.
Other fish species, notably the coelacanth, have gotten great attention among scientists and the public as representatives of ancient lineages close to the water-land transition in evolution. But coelacanths-although they are members of a class that evolved into amphibians-don't walk, and aren't themselves missing links. Nor are they the closest to such that has been found before.
Until now, the most tetrapod-like fish known was a vaguely crocodile-shaped predator from about 385 million years ago, Panderichthys, according to a commentary in the journal by Per Erik Ahlberg of Uppsala University in Sweden and Jennifer Clack of Cambridge University in the U.K. Fossils suggest this creature "was beginning to 'walk,' but perhaps in shallow water rather than on land," they wrote.
On the other side of the transition, they wrote, the earliest fragmentary tetrapods come from about 10 million years later, so that was the length of the "gap" for which fossils were missing. "Into this gap drops Tiktaalik," they wrote.

New Fossil Links Four-legged Land Animals to Ancient Fish

http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/newsroom/pr_all_img.cfm?ni=63
Arlington, Va.-How land-living animals evolved from fish has long been a scientific puzzle. A key missing piece has been knowledge of how the fins of fish transformed into the arms and legs of our ancestors. In this week's issue of the journal Science, paleontologists Neil Shubin and Michael Coates from the University of Chicago and Ted Daeschler from the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, describe a remarkable fossil that bridges the gap between fish and amphibian and provides a glimpse of the structure and function changes from fin to limb.
The fossil, a 365-million-year-old arm bone, or humerus, shares features with primitive fish fins but also has characteristics of a true limb bone. Discovered near a highway roadside in north central Penn., the bone is the earliest of its kind from any limbed animal.
" It has long been understood that the first four-legged creatures on land arose from the lobed-finned fishes in the Devonian Period," said Rich Lane, director of the National Science Foundation's (NSF) geology and paleontology program. "Through this work, we've learned that fish developed the ability to prop their bodies through modification of their fins, leading to the emergence of tetrapod limbs."
NSF, the independent federal agency that supports fundamental research and education across all fields of science and engineering, funded the research.
The bone's structure reveals an animal that had powerful forelimbs, with extensive areas for the attachment of muscles at the shoulder. "The size and extent of these muscles means that the humerus played a significant role in the support and movement of the animal," reported Shubin. "These muscles would have been important in propping the body up and pushing it off of the ground."
Interestingly, modern-day fish have smaller versions of the muscles. According to Coates, "When this humerus is compared to those of closely-related fish, it becomes clear that the ability to prop the body is more ancient than we previously thought. This means that many of the features we thought evolved to allow for life on land originally evolved in fish living in aquatic ecosystems."
The layered rock along the Clinton County, Penn., roadside were deposited by ancient stream systems that flowed during the Devonian Period, about 365 million years ago. Enclosed in the rocks is fossil evidence of an ecosystem teeming with plant and animal life. "We found a number of interesting fossils at the site," reported Daeschler, who uncovered the fossil in 1993. " But the significance of this specimen went unnoticed for several years because only a small portion of the bone was exposed and most of it lay encased in a brick-sized piece of red sandstone."
Not until three years ago, when Fred Mullison, the fossil preparator at the Academy of Natural Sciences, excavated the bone from the rock, did the importance of the new specimen become evident.
###
The work was also funded by a grant from the National Geographic Society. NSF PR04-35 NSF Program contact: Rich Lane, hlane@nsf.gov, (703) 292-8550

Evolution of "Irreducible Complexity" explained Oregon researchers prove system reducibility occurs in a Darwinian fashion
EUGENE, Ore.-(April 6, 2006)-Using new techniques for resurrecting ancient genes, scientists have for the first time reconstructed the Darwinian evolution of an apparently "irreducibly complex" molecular system.
The research was led by Joe Thornton, assistant professor of biology at the University of Oregon's Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and will be published in the April 7 issue of SCIENCE.
How natural selection can drive the evolution of complex molecular systems-those in which the function of each part depends on its interactions with the other parts-has been an unsolved issue in evolutionary biology. Advocates of Intelligent Design argue that such systems are "irreducibly complex" and thus incompatible with gradual evolution by natural selection.
"Our work demonstrates a fundamental error in the current challenges to Darwinism," said Thornton. "New techniques allowed us to see how ancient genes and their functions evolved hundreds of millions of years ago. We found that complexity evolved piecemeal through a process of Molecular Exploitation-old genes, constrained by selection for entirely different functions, have been recruited by evolution to participate in new interactions and new functions."
The scientists used state-of-the-art statistical and molecular methods to unravel the evolution of an elegant example of molecular complexity-the specific partnership of the hormone aldosterone, which regulates behavior and kidney function, along with the receptor protein that allows the body's cells to respond to the hormone. They resurrected the ancestral receptor gene-which existed more than 450 million years ago, before the first animals with bones appeared on Earth-and characterized its molecular functions. The experiments showed that the receptor had the capacity to be activated by aldosterone long before the hormone actually evolved.
Thornton's group then showed that the ancestral receptor also responded to a far more ancient hormone with a similar structure; this made it "preadapated" to be recruited into a new functional partnership when aldosterone later evolved. By recapitulating the evolution of the receptor's DNA sequence, the scientists showed that only two mutations were required to evolve the receptor's present-day functions in humans.

The Flagellum Unspun
The Collapse of "Irreducible Complexity"
by Kenneth R. Miller
This is a pre-publication copy of an article that will appear in volume entitled "Debating Design: from Darwin to DNA," edited by Michael Ruse and William Dembski, which will be published by Cambridge University Press volume in 2004. I will provide exact citation information for the article when the volume is published.

ANCIENT FOSSILS FILL GAP IN EARLY HUMAN EVOLUTION By Patricia Reaney April 12, 2006
LONDON - An international team of scientists have discovered 4.1 million year old fossils in eastern Ethiopia that fill a missing gap in human evolution.
The teeth and bones belong to a primitive species of Australopithecus known as Au. anamensis, an ape-man creature that walked on two legs.
The Australopithecus genus is thought to be is the most primitivean ancestor of modern humans. The fossils were unearthed in the Middle Awash area in the Afar desert of eastern Ethiopia. The area, about 140 miles northeast of Addis Ababa, has the most continuous record of human evolution, according to the researchers.
The remains of the hominid that had a small brain, big teeth and walked on two legs, fits into the one million-year gap between the earlier Ardipithecus and Australopithecus afarensis which includes the famous fossil skeleton known as Lucy, which lived between 3.6 and 3.3 million years ago and was found in 1974. "We now know where Australopithecus came from before 4 million years ago."

Evolution Mama

To quote Tony Russell's notes "'My evolution Gal' was inspired by a young woman obsessed with the subject who stayed at the same hotel [as Smith]. Smith takes a conservative position on the issue but there is something comic about the lyrics and the lugubrious tune they are set
to, and we may here be in the presence of Walter Smith, Humourist." ~ Clifford J OCHELTREE

"Evolution Mama."

Elektra LP Even Dozen Jug Band - early 1960s.
http://pharyngula.org/index/weblog/comments/music_to_evolve_by/
Old Lucian Burn had a gal way down in Tennessee
She told Lucian all about evolution
She was sittin' down on his knee.
Then one fine day, she got gay,
And started steppin' out.
But old brother Lucian started a revolution
The neighbors all could hear him shout.
what did he say?

He said
Evolution mama, evolution mama,
Don't you make a monkey outa me.
He said, Evolution mama,
Don't you think you got me up a tree.
Now I remember the time I had you nice and tame,
You was eatin' right outa my hand,
Some fine day, I'm gonna take good aim
And knock that peanut whistle offa your stand.
Now evolution mama, listen while I get you told
I'm gonna tell you somethin's gonna make your blood run cold
Now I ain't half man and I aint half beast
But I can do ya more good than this store bought yeast
Evolution mama, don't you make a monkey outa me.

Evolution mama, sweet smellin' mama,
Don't you make a monkey outa me.
Now, evolution mama
Don't you think ya got me up a tree.
I remember the time ya had me nice and tame
I was eatin right outa your hand
Some fine day, I'm gonna take good aim
And knock that peanut whistle offa your stand.
Now evolution mama, listen while I get you told
I'm gonna tell you somethin's gonna make your blood run cold
Gonna make ya feel mighty old
Well, I got myself a razor, I got myself a gun
Gonna carve on you if you stand still
Gonna shoot you if you run
Well evolution mama, don't you make a monkey outa me.

What does Yeast have to do with this song:
Catherine Yronwode ("Ironwood") gave an impeccableinterpretation of the term 'natural born eastman', as in Furry Lewis's Kassie Jones. She said that an 'eastman' is a 'yeastman', a dough-roller, one who would make her money 'rise'. In other words, he would make her some 'bread'. That may have been what the Even Dozens were singing about, albeit unconsciously. ~ Paul Stamler

"Evolution Girl"

Double Decker String Band, 1988

Once I met a fair young lady
and I learned to love her well
she belived ther is no Saviour
and she says there is no Hell.

Cheeks were red, her eyes do sparkle,
and her hair was chestnut brown;
she believes in evolution
and she lives in New York town.

And she said we came from monkeys
many, many years gone by
but I know she'll need a saviour
when her time shall come to die.

Won't you change your way of living,
won't you be a better girl
and prepare to meet the Saviour
in a bright and better world?

You must walk that lonesome valley,
you must cross that troubled tide.
Don't you want to meet your mother
over on the other side?

Don't believe in false teachings
for the truth to you I've told;
don't believe in evolution
or the devil will get your soul.

Quotes from U.S. Founding Fathers on Religion

Quotes by our Founding Christian Fathers
of the United States

Evolution Fun Dover Monkey Trials U.S. Fathers • Church v State Previous Next

Dear God, save us from the people who believe in you." ~ unknown

''Under God''

Public prayer fanatics borrow page from enemy's script March 5, 2003 BY ROGER EBERT
http://www.suntimes.com/output/eb-feature/cst-edt-ebert05.html
SUMMARY
The Bush administration has been dealt a setback in its campaign to allow prayer in our public schools. The full 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has voted 15-9 to back the 2-1 vote by its earlier panel finding the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional because of the words ''under God.''
The pledge, written in 1892, had those words added to it in 1954, during the Eisenhower administration, and I remember a nun in our Catholic school telling us we had to say it because it was the law -- but it was wrong, because it violated the principle of separating church and state.
The court said nothing about pledging allegiance to the flag. It spoke only of the words ''under God''--which amounted, the court said, to an endorsement of religion.
John Ashcroft, violates his oath of office daily by getting down on his knees in his government office every morning and welcoming federal employees to join him in ''voluntary'' prayer on carpets paid for by the taxpayers.

The words "In God We Trust" were not consistently on all U.S. currency until 1956, during the McCarthy Hysteria.
The Treaty of Tripoli, passed by the U.S. Senate in 1797, read in part: "The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion." The treaty was written during the Washington administration, and sent to the Senate during the Adams administration. It was read aloud to the Senate, and each Senator received a printed copy. This was the 339th time that a recorded vote was required by the Senate, but only the third time a vote was unanimous (the next time was to honor George Washington). There is no record of any debate or dissension on the treaty. It was reprinted in full in three newspapers - two in Philadelphia, one in New York City. There is no record of public outcry or complaint in subsequent editions of the papers.

The United States of America was founded by radical secularists and atheists. Michigan State staffer John Bice points out that Jefferson actually scissored out the parts in the Bible that referred to angels and such. Bice wrote, "The Rev. Bird Wilson, an Episcopal minister and historian, lamented in an 1831 sermon, 'The founders of our nation were nearly all Infidels.'"

QUOTES BY THE The CHRISTIAN Founding Fathers

George Washington, 1st President (1789-1797)
"... the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion ..."
Source: The "Treaty of Tripoli," negotiated and signed by the First President of the United States, on November 4, 1796

The Founding Fathers Were NOT Christians

"It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." and "I do not find in orthodox Christianity one redeeming feature." ~ Thomas Jefferson

"The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter." -- Thomas Jefferson (letter to J. Adams April 11,1823)

"Christianity ... (has become) the most perverted system that ever shone on man. ... Rogueries, absurdities and untruths were perpetrated upon the teachings of Jesus by a large band of dupes and importers ..." -- Thomas Jefferson, 3rd President (1801-1809) Source: Six Historic Americans, by John E. Remsberg

"In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot ..." -- Thomas Jefferson:
Source: Thomas Jefferson letter to Horatio G. Spafford, 1814. ME 14:119

James Madison, fourth president and father of the Constitution, was not religious in any conventional sense. "Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise."
"During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the Clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity, in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution."
From: The Madisons by Virginia Moore, P. 43 (1979, McGraw-Hill Co. New York, NY) quoting a letter by JM to William Bradford April 1, 1774, and James Madison, A Biography in his Own Words, edited by Joseph Gardner, p. 93, (1974, Newsweek, New York, NY) Quoting Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments by JM, June 1785.

"The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood for centuries." ~ James Madison

"I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church." ~ Thomas Paine

"The Bible is not my book, and Christianity is not my religion. I could never give assent to the long, complicated statements of Christian dogma." ~ Abraham Lincoln

"This would be the best of all possible worlds, if there were no religions in it. -- John Adams, 2nd President (1797-1801)
Source: A letter to Thomas Jefferson, May 15, 1817

Benjamin Franklin:
"I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies."
Source: "Toward the Mystery"

Thomas Paine (1737-1809):

"I would not dare to so dishonor my Creator God by attaching His name to that book (the Bible)."
The Age of Reason, Part 1, Section 5

Thomas Paine (1737-1809):
"The study of theology, as it stands in the Christian churches, is the study of nothing; it is founded on nothing; it rests on no principles; it proceeds by no authority; it has no data; it can demonstrate nothing; and it admits of no conclusion." From The Age of Reason

Fixing the Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Debate

EVOLUTION
Is intelligent design religion or science?
Intelligent Design vs Evolution in the classroom.

Teaching Evolution or Creation Debate

Evolution Fun Dover Monkey Trials U.S. Fathers Church v State Previous • Next

The Evolution of Man

Galileo - who started it all, and paid the price - had "a wonderful way" of separating the supernatural from the natural. There are two equally worthy ways to understand the divine, Galileo said. "One was reverent contemplation of the Bible, God's word," "The other was through scientific contemplation of the world, which is his creation. ~ Dr. Holton

" Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away " ~ Philip K. Dick

Hominids diverged from the chimp branch of the family tree roughly six million years ago, producing a series of evolutionary dead-ends before the ultimately successful genus Homo emerged. H. neanderthalensis and H. sapiens grew out of the same line at different times.
The Neanderthals' ancestors diverged first, and they left Africa a couple of hundred thousand years ahead of ours. Homo sapiens arrived in Europe about 50,000 years ago. The two species overlapped for perhaps 20,000 years before the Neanderthals went extinct. Scientists still aren't sure why. A detailed analysis of human and chimp DNA suggests the lines finally diverged less than 5.4 million years ago. [ 1 ]

Who is Teaching Science in K12 Schools?

New Jersey is the fourth state so far to reject the $800,000 abstinence education money , after California, Pennsylvania and Maine.

Teachers have the lowest IQs of any college graduate group. Local school boards are elected. What are their qualifications? ANSWER

They have almost complete latitude to set the content of the curriculum! It is their decision that would have an unconstitutionally religious purpose and effect.

Most K12 State Science Standards Don't Make the Grade.

SCIENCE TEST SCORES FALL FOR HIGH SCHOOL SENIORS 2006
The first nationwide science test administered in five years shows that achievement among high school seniors has declined across the past decade, even as scores in science rose among fourth graders and held steady among eighth graders, reported the Education Department. The drop in science proficiency appeared to reflect a broader trend, in which some academic gains made in elementary grades and middle school have been seen to fade during the high school years. The science results came from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a comprehensive examination administered in 2005 by a branch of the Department of Education to hundreds of thousands of students in all 50 states. The science test, which was administered during the first months of 2005, covered the earth, physical and life sciences, writes Sam Dillon. Some teachers blamed the decreasing amount of time devoted to science in schools, in part because of the No Child Left Behind Law, whose requirements for annual testing in reading and math during the elementary grades have led many schools to decrease the time spent on science or to abandon its teaching altogether. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/24/education/24cnd-exam.html

" The State of State Science Standards 2005 " the first comprehensive study of science academic standards conducted since 2000 -- appraised the quality of each states K-12 science standards as they are rushing to meet the No Child Left Behind Acts mandate for testing in this critical subject. The results are mixed. Nearly half of the fifty states surveyed received grades of "D" or "F" in a new review of statewide academic standards for primary-secondary school science. Every state received a letter grade based on how well its standards met a set of rigorous criteria, including:

CHRISTIAN RIGHT "STRIKINGLY UNSUCCESSFUL" IN SCHOOL BOARD EFFORTS
During a period in which the Christian Right wielded a great deal of influence in the federal and state political spheres, it appears to have been strikingly unsuccessful in its long-term efforts to push state and local school boards to adopt science curricula that include questioning the theory of evolution and teaching intelligent design as a legitimate alternative theory of creation, according to a Connecticut College researcher. Kimberly Trebbi Richards found that the Christian Right's initial short-term successes occurred through exceptionally effective development of interest group organization and lobbying techniques focused on electing or re-electing supportive officials. However, the more permanent reversals of those short-term successes came through growing counter-organization by opposing groups and through court decisions. Richards examined case studies from three major state or local areas where the Christian Right was initially successful in influencing science education at the elementary or high school levels: Kansas, Georgia and Pennsylvania.

University of Calif. Sued Over Creationism
http://www.salon.com/wire/ap/archive.html?wire=D8C8AM600.htm August 27,2005 | LOS ANGELES
A group representing California religious schools has filed a lawsuit accusing the University of California system of discriminating against high schools that teach creationism and other conservative Christian viewpoints.
The Association of Christian Schools International, which represents more than 800 schools, filed a federal lawsuit Thursday claiming UC admissions officials have refused to certify high school science courses that use textbooks challenging Darwin's theory of evolution. Other rejected courses include "Christianity's Influence in American History."
According to the lawsuit, the Calvary Chapel Christian School in Murrieta was told its courses were rejected because they use textbooks printed by two Christian publishers, Bob Jones University Press and A Beka Books.
Wendell E. Bird, a lawyer for the association, said the policy violates the rights of students and religious schools.
"A threat to one religion is a threat to all," he said.
UC spokeswoman Ravi Poorsina said she could not comment, because the university had not been served with the lawsuit. Still, she said the university has a right to set course requirements.
"These requirements were established after careful study by faculty and staff to ensure that students who come here are fully prepared with broad knowledge and the critical thinking skills necessary to succeed," Poorsina.

K - 12 PUBLIC EDUCATION

PROJECT STEVE

NCSE's "Project Steve" is a tongue-in-cheek parody of a long-standing creationist tradition of amassing lists of "scientists who doubt evolution" or "scientists who dissent from Darwinism." (For examples of such lists, see the FAQs on the web site at http://www.ncseweb.org/article.asp?category=18
Creationists draw up these lists to convince the public that evolution is somehow being rejected by scientists, that it is a "theory in crisis." Most members of the public lack sufficient contact with the scientific community to know that this claim is totally unfounded. NCSE has been exhorted by its members to compile a list of thousands of scientists affirming the validity of the theory of evolution, but although we easily could have done so, we have resisted such pressure. We did not wish to mislead the public into thinking that scientific issues are decided by who has the longer list of scientists!

Project Steve mocks this practice with a bit of humor, and because "Steves" (and Stephanies) are only about 1% of scientists, it incidentally makes the point that tens of thousands of scientists support evolution. And it honors the late Stephen Jay Gould, NCSE supporter and friend. As of 2/19, the Steveometer was 244 and rising. To join the list, write Skip Evans at evans@ncseweb.org.

Lawrence Krauss Talk of the Nation audio
*Ambrose Swasey professor of physics and chairman of the physics department at Case Western Reserve University Director of the Center for Education and Research in Cosmology and Astrophysics at Case Western Reserve University

The Complete Works of Charles Darwin Online

K-12 Government INITIATIVES from 1999

Creation vs. Evolution Mailing List

Church-State Separation in Public Schools

Separation Between Church and State in the classroom.

Separation between Church and State. Teaching Evolution or Creation

Evolution Fun Dover Monkey Trials U.S. Fathers Church v State Previous • Next


The Treaty of Tripoli, passed by the U.S. Senate in 1797, read in part: "The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion." The treaty was written during the Washington administration, and sent to the Senate during the Adams administration. It was read aloud to the Senate, and each Senator received a printed copy. This was the 339th time that a recorded vote was required by the Senate, but only the third time a vote was unanimous (the next time was to honor George Washington). There is no record of any debate or dissension on the treaty. It was reprinted in full in three newspapers - two in Philadelphia, one in New York City. There is no record of public outcry or complaint in subsequent editions of the papers.

Americans United for the Separation Between Church and State

THE LAW

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Through the Fourteenth Amendment, this mandate applies to the states and government employees. The first clause of this amendment, commonly referred to as the "Establishment Clause," indeed does guarantee a separation of church and state.

It is the Fourteenth Amendment and the process of incorporation that makes parts of the Bill of Rights apply to the states. State governments are not permitted to engage in cruel and unusual punishment (not just the feds.), state governments are not allowed to abridge the free exercise of religion (not just the feds.), state governments must allow freedom of the press (not just the feds.), state governments cannot abridge the people's right to free assemble or petition their government or their right to freedom of speech (not just the feds.).

No school teacher has the right to make any student feel that their own religious belief is superior to a pupil's belief.

THE LAW Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Through the Fourteenth Amendment, this mandate applies to the states and government employees. The first clause of this amendment, commonly referred to as the "Establishment Clause," indeed does guarantee a separation of church and state. It is the Fourteenth Amendment and the process of incorporation that makes parts of the Bill of Rights apply to the states. State governments are not permitted to engage in cruel and unusual punishment (not just the feds.), state governments are not allowed to abridge the free exercise of religion (not just the feds.), state governments must allow freedom of the press (not just the feds.), state governments cannot abridge the people's right to free assemble or petition their government or their right to freedom of speech (not just the feds.). No school teacher has the right to make any student feel that their own religious belief is superior to a pupil's belief. A Teachers Guide to Religion in the Public Schools PDF Can a teacher wear religious garb to school provided the teacher does not proselytize to the students? Article “Intelligent design is simply the most recent version of creationism, which is admittedly a religious concept,” said Alan Leshner, chief executive of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science and publisher of the journal Science. “There is no scientific basis to intelligent design.” Science is concerned with the natural world, while intelligent design supposes an agent independent of the natural world. You can teach such concepts, Leshner and Scott say; indeed, you should — just do it in philosophy and religion and literature classes. Don't do it in science classes, because, by definition, that's religion. It isn't science. One side can be wrong Accepting 'intelligent design' in science classrooms would have disastrous consequences, warn Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne. If ID really were a scientific theory, positive evidence for it, gathered through research, would fill peer-reviewed scientific journals. This doesn't happen. It isn't that editors refuse to publish ID research. There simply isn't any ID research to publish. Its advocates bypass normal scientific due process by appealing directly to the non-scientific public and - with great shrewdness - to the government officials they elect.

Creationism's Trojan Horse:The Wedge of Intelligent Design
Barbara Forrest & Paul R. Gross Oxford University Press 2004 Forrest and Gross expose the scientific failure, the religious essence, and the political ambitions of "intelligent design" creationism. They examine the movement's "Wedge Strategy," which has advanced and is succeeding through public relations rather than through scientific research. Analyzing the content and character of "intelligent design theory," they highlight its threat to public education and to the separation of church and state.

Public prayer fanatics borrow page from enemy's script
March 5, 2003 BY ROGER EBERT
http://www.suntimes.com/output/eb-feature/cst-edt-ebert05.html

SUMMARY: The Bush administration has been dealt a setback in its campaign to allow prayer in our public schools. The full 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has voted 15-9 to back the 2-1 vote by its earlier panel finding the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional because of the words ''under God.''
The pledge, written in 1892, had those words added to it in 1954, during the Eisenhower administration, and I remember a nun in our Catholic school telling us we had to say it because it was the law -- but it was wrong, because it violated the principle of separating church and state.
The court said nothing about pledging allegiance to the flag. It spoke only of the words ''under God''--which amounted, the court said, to an endorsement of religion.
John Ashcroft, violates his oath of office daily by getting down on his knees in his government office every morning and welcoming federal employees to join him in ''voluntary'' prayer on carpets paid for by the taxpayers.


"Morality is doing what is right, regardless what we are told. Religious dogma is doing what we are told, no matter what is right.

The Hidden Dangers of Fundamentalism
Jack Woodall is the director of the Nucleus for the Investigation of Emerging Infectious Diseases in the department of medical biochemistry at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
A connection exists between disease outbreaks and extreme religious practice.
Polio could pose as much of a threat as suicide bombers. Religious fundamentalism is bad for your health. There are, of course, the ill effects suffered by suicide bombers and their innocent victims. Consider also the sarin gas attacks by the Aum Shinrikyo (Supreme Truth) sect, which killed 12 people in the Tokyo subway in 1995, and sickened 1,000 more. (Yes, I know the media reported 5,000 casualties, but 80% of them were the "worried well" who sought hospital emergency departments because of contact with victims, or consequent anxiety attacks).
What concerns me, however, is infectious disease. Consider these case histories:
The last outbreak of polio in Canada and the United States, in 1978-1979, was the result of travel from the Netherlands, where an outbreak was ongoing, to Canada by members of the Reformed Netherlands Congregation, a religious group that refused vaccinations.
In the fall of 1984 followers of the Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, who had purchased the small town of Antelope in Wasco County in north central Oregon, plotted to take over the county. They tested a plan to sicken many of the county's voters on Election Day by contaminating 10 salad bars with salmonella in the county's largest town, The Dalles. Although no one died, 751 people fell ill. The commune panicked and gave up the plan.
In Uganda in 1998, an outbreak of cholera killed 83, and the resurgence of the disease was blamed on members of a sect in Soono Parish who hid patients from medical patrols. The sect was called Red Cross (not to be confused with the international relief organization), a group that collects dead bodies in the belief that resurrection is imminent.
When cholera broke out in Zimbabwe in 2002, it spread quickly among members of the Johanne Marange Apostolic Faith sect who were resisting treatment.
Most disastrously, in March 2004 the Kano state government in northern Nigeria refused to take part in a United Nations-led campaign to vaccinate West African children against polio. Islamic clerics alleged that the vaccine had been filled with hormones as part of a US-led plot to sterilize African girls. As a result, polio has spread from there, by the end of September 2005, to 11 previously polio-free countries, mostly in Africa but including Indonesia, Nepal, and Yemen. More than 900 cases of paralysis have been recorded, and the outbreak has cost many thousands of dollar-equivalents in mass vaccination campaigns that they can ill afford. Mass campaigns are no longer needed once a country has eradicated polio but must be reinstated after an importation.
Also in 2004, the Iraqi Communist Party alleged that the Yazidi religious sect in northern Iraq was facing genocide as a result of poisoning. It stated: "Four hundred cases of poisoning have been recorded, most of which are in critical condition. ... The matter has gone as far as affecting the physician of the only hospital in the village, who died of poisoning." The World Health Organization has investigated and found that 50 cases of gastrointestinal illness (not 400) had been reported in Dohuk in northern Iraq. Thirteen of the cases were from a housing complex in Khanak inhabited by the Yazidi, who practice Zoroastrianism, the ancient religion of Persians and Kurds. The water supply was in poor condition, and it was contaminated with sewage, not poison. This is particularly ironic because, according to the tenets of Zoroastrianism, in order to conserve the purity of water, fire, and earth, the dead cannot be immersed, cremated, or buried; Herodotus noted that the Persians do not urinate or spit in rivers. So the Yazidis would have been expected to take particular care with their water supply.
In May 2005, a rubella outbreak in a cluster of unvaccinated religious communities in southwestern Ontario, Canada, also probably originated from the Netherlands in the same way as the polio cases a quarter-century earlier.
The moral of this story: If you are a religious fundamentalist and care about your health, don't believe every rumor you hear, don't refuse vaccination or treatment, and keep your water supply clean .

The Dover Trial: Kitzmiller v. Dover

A federal judge today declared the teaching of intelligent design in Dover Area School District unconstitutional.

Evolution Fun • Dover • Monkey Trials U.S. Fathers Church v State Previous Next

Dover PA

"This country wasn't founded on Muslim beliefs or evolution," "This country was founded on Christianity, and our students should be taught as such." ~ Dover Pennsylvania School Board member Bill Buckingham, chair of the curriculum committee, started this fight. He objects to Darwinism. He wants a science book that teaches Christian creationism.

The suit brought by 11 parents is being heard without a jury in Harrisburg by U.S. District Judge John Jones III, whom President Bush appointed to the bench in 2002.

12/20/05
A federal judge today declared the teaching of intelligent design in Dover Area School District unconstitutional, saying an "ill-informed faction on a school board" adopted a policy that violated the separation of church and state. In a far-reaching decision, Judge John E. Jones 3d concluded that intelligent design is not science.
"In making this determination, we have addressed the seminal question of whether ID is science," Jones wrote. "We have concluded that it is not, and moreover that ID cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents."
He scolded the board's majority for requiring teachers to read a statement to high school biology students that noted "gaps" in Darwin's theory of evolution and directed them to a book on intelligent design in the school library.
"The breathtaking inanity of the board's decision is evident when considered against the factual backdrop which has now been fully revealed through this trial," Jones said in a 139-page decision. "The students, parents, and teachers of the Dover Area School District deserved better than to be dragged into this legal maelstrom, with its resulting utter waste of monetary and personal resources."
Jones said those who disagree with the decision - the first-ever federal trial on the teaching of intelligent design - "will likely mark it as the product of an activist judge." But the judge, a Republican appointed to the bench by President Bush, said "this is manifestly not an activist Court."
School board chairwoman, Bernadette Reinking, said as far as she knows the board has no intention of appealing the case. She was one of eight new members elected to the nine-member board in November who oppose the teaching of intelligent design.
"I'm glad that it is finished," Reinking said. "The board wanted some finality to this."
INQUIRER STAFF WRITER HARRISBURG 12/20/05
http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/13449670.htm

Read the George Bush Appointed U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III Court Decision

DER SPIEGEL in today's account of the judical defeat of "Intelligent Design" wrote as follows: "Richter John Jones erklrte in der Urteilsbegrndung, es sei erstaunlich, dass mehrere Mitglieder des Schulrats stolz ihren Glauben in der ffentlichkeit verkndeten, sich aber nicht scheuten, zu lgen". In translation:" Judge Jon Jones declared in his judgement that it is astonishing, that a number of members of the Schoolcouncil proclaimed proudly their faith, but did not heistate to lie ". Astonishing and wonderful of the Judge! The very essence of science is disinterested integrity, and that has been lacking in Intelligent Design and its various mutants.

11/9/05 DOVER, Pa. -- Voters came down hard Tuesday on school board members who backed a statement on intelligent design being read in biology class ( National Association of Biology Teachers ), ousting eight Republicans and replacing them with Democrats who want the concept stripped from the science curriculum ( pick out a Science Book ).Among the losing incumbents on the Dover, Pa., board were two members who testified in favor of the intelligent design policy at a recently concluded federal trial on the Dover policy: the chairwoman, Sheila Harkins, and Alan Bonsell.

12-13/04 Press Conference Announcing Legal Challenge to "Intelligent Design" Curriculum in PA School District. Article
The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, Americans United for Separation of Church and State and attorneys with Pepper Hamilton LLP will file a federal lawsuit on Tuesday on behalf of 11 parents who say that presenting "intelligent design" to students in public school violates their religious liberty by promoting religious beliefs to their children under the guise of science education. The lawsuit will be the first in the nation to challenge the instruction of "intelligent design," which is an assertion that an intelligent, supernatural entity has intervened in the history of life. The "intelligent design" debate gained national attention after the Dover Area School District Board in Pennsylvania voted in October to require science teachers to present this religious view as an alternative to the scientific theory of evolution. Dover is believed to be the first school district to mandate such a policy. Parents, scientists, clergy members and attorneys who are challenging the Dover School District policy.

The Dover statement:
Text of the intelligent design statement Dover, Pa., teachers were instructed to read to their students:

The Pennsylvania Academic Standards require students to learn about Darwin's theory of evolution and eventually to take a standardized test of which evolution is a part.
Because Darwin's theory is a theory, it continues to be tested as new evidence is discovered. The theory is not a fact. Gaps in the theory exist for which there is no evidence. A theory is defined as a well-tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations.
Intelligent design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin's view. The reference book, “Of Pandas and People,” is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what intelligent design actually involves.
With respect to any theory, students are encouraged to keep an open mind. The school leaves the discussion of the origins of life to individual students and their families. As a standards-driven district, class instruction focuses upon preparing students to achieve proficiency on standards-based assessments.

Evolution on the Front Line
AAAS has played a prominent role in responding to efforts in Kansas, Pennsylvania and elsewhere to weaken or compromise the teaching of evolution in public school science classrooms. Here are some background materials on the controversy and links to AAAS resources on evolution.

Science vs. Faith

Monkey Trials: History of Evolution in Schools

Is intelligent design religion or science?
Intelligent Design vs Evolution in the classroom.

Teaching Evolution or Creation Debate

Evolution Fun Dover • Monkey Trials U.S. Fathers Church v State Previous Next

The New Monkey Trial
By Michelle Goldberg Jan. 10, 2005 DOVER, Pa.
By persuading the Dover, Pa., school board to teach creationism, Christian zealots have provoked a showdown over the status of not just evolutionary theory, but science itself. It was an ordinary springtime school board meeting in the bedroom community of Dover, Pa. The high school needed new biology textbooks, and the science department had recommended Kenneth Miller and Joseph Levine's "Biology." "It was a fantastic text," said Carol "Casey" Brown, 57, a self-described Goldwater Republican and the board's senior member. "It just followed our curriculum so beautifully."But Bill Buckingham , a new board member who'd recently become chair of the curriculum committee, had an objection. "Biology," he said, was "laced with Darwinism." He wanted a book that balanced theories of evolution with Christian creationism, and he was willing to turn his town into a cultural battlefield to get it. "This country wasn't founded on Muslim beliefs or evolution," Buckingham, a stocky, gray-haired man who wears a red, white and blue crucifix pin on his lapel, said at the meeting. "This country was founded on Christianity, and our students should be taught as such."

State v. John Scopes The Monkey Trial
Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan during the trial
Photo Credit: CORBIS/Bettmann
Scopes Monkey Trial 1925

Who would dominate American culture--the modernists or the traditionalists? Scopes Trial Journalists were looking for a showdown, and they found one in a Dayton, Tennessee courtroom in the summer of 1925. There a jury was to decide the fate of John Scopes , a high school biology teacher charged with illegally teaching the theory of evolution. The guilt or innocence of John Scopes, and even the constitutionality of Tennessee's anti-evolution statute , mattered little. The meaning of the trial emerged through its interpretation as a conflict of social and intellectual values.

Unpublished Photographs from 1925 Tennessee vs. John Scopes "Monkey Trial" in Smithsonian Archives

"Evolution | Creation Debate: A Time for Truth " Bioscience 31, 559 1981 by Lewontin
" It is a fact that the earth, with liquid water, is more than 3.6 billion years old. It is a fact that cellular life has been around for at least half of that period and that organized multicellular life is at least 800 million years old.

It is a fact that major life forms now on earth were not at all represented in the past. There were no birds or mammals 250 million years ago.

It is a fact that major life forms of the past are no longer living. There used to be dinosaurs and Pithecanthropus, and there are none now.

It is a fact that all living forms come from previous living forms. Therefore, all present forms of life arose from ancestral forms that were different. Birds arose from nonbirds and humans from nonhumans. No person who pretends to any understanding of the natural world can deny these facts any more than she or he can deny that the earth is round, rotates on its axis, and revolves around the sun."

Those who favor intelligent design want to offer it as an alternative to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, critics want to keep the idea out of biology textbooks. They say the theory is nothing more than a dressed-up version of creation science, which the U.S. Supreme Court has prohibited from public schools as a violation of the separation of church and state.

The alternative to evolution theory is not creationism or intelligent design.

But if one is to be objective one would point out that non-proven theories fall into the category of "theoretical" eg "theoretical physics"; "theoretical biology" etc. Not all disciplines have a formally separate "theoretical" branch. If the theoretical branch included philosophy, then we could point out that in philosophy, religious philosophy is compared with other ideas and concepts. Descartes' ideas are discussed in philosophy without any fear of separation of church and state. Thus for religious ideas to be discussed in biology, a separate branch of biology, being "theoretical biology" or "biological philosophy", must be considered where all unproven or contentious ideas can be evaluated together. As "intelligent design" is a religious philosophy, it does not belong in biology classes.
A scientist wishes equate valid theory with public knowledge, not belief, via education. It is religion that wishes to equate belief with public knowledge, by force if necessary. Everything in the sciences is just an assumption so everything is open to reasoned discussion.

All science does is validly compare ideas.
To be able to do this requires an exacting methodology.
Thus "quibbles over details of the philosophy of science" are more important than almost anything else.
The epistemology of science is one of the most important studies that is available because it provides the thin blue line that allows us to know the difference between a belief and a theory. I would estimate that most of us waste our minds on a needless conflict between theory and belief. Epistemology provides a way to know the difference.
The difference is enormous.

The scientists made an enormous epistemological blunder trying to contest creationists on their own ground: the battlefield of belief. Theory cannot contest belief and belief cannot contest theory. If you make them contest they destroy each other. People ask "do you believe in evolution?" What is the only possible scientific reply? Evolution is not a belief, it is a testable theory. ~ John Edser Independent Researcher

Bruce Chapman, president of The Discovery Institute has led a movement on the "intelligent design theory" -- a belief that species did not evolve by natural selection but instead progressed according to a plan or design. San Antonio Express-News reported on 8/13/03 that the Texas Education Agency disclosed that biology textbook publisher Holt, Rinehart & Winston had submitted changes in its biology textbook to a passage directing students to "study hypotheses for the origin of life that are alternatives" to others posed in the book. The elected Texas Board of Education has no control over textbook content but can reject books because of errors or failure to follow the state curriculum, which is mandated by the Legislature.

Teaching Evolution Feb. 6, 2004
According to the Georgia Department of Education, the word evolution is a "controversial buzzword" that should be removed from the state's biology curriculum.
In this hour, we'll take a look at science education in schools. Should evolution be out? And what should science class teach us about the age and origins of the universe? Join NPR's Ira Flatow for a look at new challenges to teaching evolution in public schools.
Guests: Eugenie C. Scott
*Director of the National Center for Science Education, Inc.
NCSE -- a nonprofit, tax-exempt membership organization working to defend the teaching of evolution against sectarian attack. We are a nationally-recognized clearinghouse for information and advice to keep evolution in the science classroom and "scientific creationism" out. http://www.ncseweb.org/
National Center for Science Education, Inc.
Eugenie C. Scott, Ph.D.Executive Director 510-601-7203 fax: 510-601-7204
420 40th St., #2 Oakland, CA 94609-2509

Refuting creationism